Avvo Rating 10 - Mohammad Nazih - Top Attorney
Avvo Client Choice Award 2024 - Mohammad Nazih - 5 stars
Super Lawyers 2025
Super Lawyers / Mohammad Abuershaid / Selected in 2025 Thomson Reuters - Badge
Super Lawyers / Mohammad Abuershaid / Rising Stars 2023 - Badge
Super Lawyers / Mohammad Abuershaid / Selected in 2023 Thomson Reuters - Badge
Super Lawyers / Mohammad Abuershaid / Selected in 2022 Thomson Reuters - Badge
Super Lawyers / Mohammad Abuershaid / Selected in 2021 Thomson Reuters - Badge
Super Lawyers / Mohammad Abuershaid / Rising Stars - Badge
Avvo Clients Choice Award 2023 - Mohammad Nazih Abuershaid - 5 Stars
Rising Stars Mohammad Abuershaid
Rising Stars Mohammad Abuershaid

San Marino and La Cañada Flintridge DCFS Lawyer: Juvenile Dependency Defense From Our Pasadena Office

Top Los Angeles DCFS Defense Attorney

San Marino and La Cañada Flintridge are two of the most closely held communities in Los Angeles County: small school districts, their own or contracted police, and families who have lived on the same streets for generations. A DCFS referral does not respect any of that. It is worked out of the same Pasadena regional office as every other foothill case, on the same 30-day clock, toward the same courthouse in Monterey Park. ALL Trial Lawyers represents San Marino and La Cañada parents from our office on Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena, through investigations, safety plans, emergency removals, detention hearings, and contested trials at the Edmund D. Edelman Children’s Court.

Free, confidential, 24 hours a day: (866) 811-4255.

Quick answer

A San Marino or La Cañada Flintridge DCFS lawyer represents parents in Los Angeles County juvenile dependency investigations and court proceedings initiated by the Department of Children and Family Services. San Marino, La Cañada Flintridge, South Pasadena, and the Pasadena foothills are typically assigned to the DCFS Pasadena Regional Office. If the department believes a child is at risk, it can detain the child, file a Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 petition, and open a case at the Edmund D. Edelman Children’s Court in Monterey Park, the single dependency court for the entire county. Our firm defends foothill parents from the first social worker contact through every hearing, and closes most referrals before a petition is ever filed.

Why San Marino and La Cañada cases are different

Dependency law is the same statute in every city in California. What changes is which agencies are involved, which institutions make the call, what else the family is litigating, and what the family has to lose. We build the defense around those specifics.

The Pasadena regional office

Referrals from San Marino, La Cañada Flintridge, South Pasadena, Altadena, and Pasadena itself are typically worked out of the DCFS Pasadena Regional Office. Its intake patterns, its supervisors, and the way it documents safety plans differ from the offices on the Westside and in the South Bay, and knowing them shapes strategy from the first phone call. Our Pasadena office is minutes from it.

Two cities, two police agencies

San Marino has its own police department. La Cañada Flintridge contracts with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Crescenta Valley Station. A domestic call in San Marino and a domestic call in La Cañada produce different reports written by different agencies, and the DCFS referral that follows reads differently as a result. We know both.

Where the calls come from

San Marino Unified (Carver, Valentine, Huntington Middle, San Marino High) and La Cañada Unified (La Cañada Elementary, Palm Crest, Paradise Canyon, La Cañada High); the Pasadena independent schools these families use, including Flintridge Prep, Flintridge Sacred Heart, Polytechnic, Westridge, and Mayfield; the emergency departments at Huntington Hospital and USC Verdugo Hills Hospital; pediatricians and therapists in the Pasadena medical corridor, including therapists retained during a divorce. Each is a mandated reporter under Penal Code section 11165.7 who was legally required to make the call. A report is not a finding.

Custody litigation and professional consequences

A large share of the referrals we see from the foothills arrive in the middle of a custody case at the Pasadena Courthouse, and foothill parents disproportionately hold professional licenses in medicine, engineering, law, and finance, including at JPL, Caltech, and the Huntington medical community. Once a section 300 petition is filed, the dependency court takes exclusive control of custody under Welfare and Institutions Code section 304, and its exit orders under section 362.4 become the family court’s orders when the case closes. A substantiated finding or a Child Abuse Central Index listing under Penal Code section 11170 follows a licensed professional into the board that licenses them. Both risks are managed the same way: close the referral before a petition exists, and document that nothing reached CACI.

Before a petition is filed: where most foothill cases are won

DCFS has roughly 30 days to complete an emergency response investigation and close a referral as unfounded, inconclusive, or substantiated. That closing decision, not the courtroom, is where most cases are actually decided. Investigation-stage representation looks like this:

  1. The first contact is redirected through counsel. You remain cooperative. The social worker hears from your attorney within 24 hours, the allegation is put into specific terms, and home access and interviews are scheduled rather than improvised.
  2. The safety plan is narrowed before it is signed. A specific end date, no admission language, defined supervision, and a written statement of what closes the referral. A plan signed in the driveway is Exhibit A at a detention hearing under section 319.
  3. Corroboration is delivered, not withheld. Pediatric records, school attendance, a custody order that explains a suspicious pattern, a declaration correcting the timeline, an independent specialist’s letter when the allegation is medical. Delivered to the assigned worker and supervisor before the closing decision, in a neutral, professional package.
  4. The exit is documented. We ask for the disposition in writing, argue for unfounded rather than inconclusive, and confirm whether anything was sent to the Child Abuse Central Index. Where a listing exists, we request the grievance hearing under Penal Code section 11169 before it reaches a licensing board or an employer.

What we handle

  • Pre-petition investigation defense: home visits, school interviews under Penal Code section 11174.3, safety plans, and the 30-day closing decision.
  • Detention hearings: petition within 48 hours of removal, hearing by the end of the next judicial day (sections 313 and 315). We prepare the alternative-to-detention plan and the relative who can take placement under section 361.3 the night before.
  • Jurisdiction trials: cross-examining the social worker, excluding hearsay, and retaining the medical and forensic experts who answer section 300 allegations.
  • Disposition and case plans: pushing back on excessive services, protecting visitation, and getting children home under family maintenance rather than out under reunification.
  • Review, permanency, and section 388 petitions: six-, twelve-, and eighteen-month reviews, contested section 366.26 hearings, and modification petitions when circumstances change.
  • CACI grievance hearings: challenging a Child Abuse Central Index listing before it reaches a licensing board or an employer.

Lead attorney: Mohammad “Mo” Abuershaid

Founding partner and lead trial attorney, ALL Trial Lawyers / Abuershaid Law, APC. California State Bar #297270. Mo began his career at the Orange County Public Defender’s Office and has personally handled more than 2,000 juvenile dependency matters across Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and San Diego counties. He is a Super Lawyers and Rising Stars honoree every year from 2020 through 2026, holds an Avvo 10.0 rating, and practices in English, Spanish, and Arabic.

For San Marino and La Cañada families, that means an attorney who appears regularly at Edelman, knows the Pasadena regional office, and has litigated the allegation patterns these cases actually produce: injuries first evaluated at Huntington Hospital, referrals timed to custody hearings, and allegations built on a parent’s mental health treatment or medication.

Our Pasadena office

ALL Trial Lawyers / Abuershaid Law, APC 117 E Colorado Blvd, Suite 600, Pasadena, CA 91105 Also: 10880 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1101, Los Angeles, CA 90024 Phone: (866) 811-4255, 24/7 emergency line Hours: Weekdays 7:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., weekends 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. In-person consultations by appointment; phone and video any hour. Court: Edmund D. Edelman Children’s Court, 201 Centre Plaza Dr, Monterey Park, CA 91754 (roughly 20 minutes from Pasadena via the 710 and the 10)

Frequently asked questions

Which DCFS office handles San Marino and La Cañada Flintridge? Both cities, along with South Pasadena, Altadena, and Pasadena, are typically assigned to the DCFS Pasadena Regional Office. The assignment is confirmed at first contact and shapes strategy from day one.

Do I have to let the social worker into my home? Not without a warrant, a court order, or an emergency. You can decline entry politely and say your attorney will contact the worker within 24 hours. Refusing entry is not evidence of abuse and cannot by itself justify removal.

Where will my case be heard, and how soon? At Edmund D. Edelman Children’s Court, 201 Centre Plaza Dr, Monterey Park, about 20 minutes from Pasadena. If a child is removed, DCFS must file its petition within 48 hours, excluding weekends and court holidays, and the detention hearing is held by the end of the next judicial day after filing (sections 313 and 315).

Can my child stay with a grandparent instead of going to foster care? Yes. Relatives receive preferential consideration under section 361.3, and DCFS must begin assessing relatives at the time of removal under section 309. A relative who is named, willing to be assessed, and present at the detention hearing changes the outcome.

DCFS was called during my custody case at the Pasadena Courthouse. What now? Tell your dependency attorney and your family law attorney about each other the same day. Do not confront the suspected reporter, and communicate with the other parent only in writing about logistics. If a petition is filed, the dependency court controls custody under section 304 until the case closes.

I hold a professional license. Will a DCFS referral reach my licensing board? A referral alone does not. A substantiated finding reported to the Child Abuse Central Index can, because many boards check CACI. Closing the referral as unfounded, and requesting a grievance hearing under Penal Code section 11169 if a listing was made, is how we keep it from getting there.

Tell us what DCFS told you.

Whether a social worker just called, a safety plan is on the table, or your child has been removed, the first conversation is free and confidential. We will tell you in ten minutes whether you need representation.

Call (866) 811-4255. Free. Confidential. 24/7.


Attorney advertising. This page is general legal information about California juvenile dependency law and is not legal advice for any specific situation. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship; that relationship is formed only by a signed written engagement agreement. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Statutes cited are summarized and subject to change. Responsible attorney: Mohammad Abuershaid, Esq. (State Bar #297270), ALL Trial Lawyers / Abuershaid Law, APC, 117 E Colorado Blvd, Suite 600, Pasadena, CA 91105. Phone (866) 811-4255.

Get in Touch

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 Protecting Parental Rights

Fill out the contact form or call us at (866) 811-4255 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message